Povezanost vrednosti i tipova involviranosti potrošača u proces donošenja odluke o kupovini
Correlation of Consumer Values and Product Involvement
Apstrakt
Osnovni cilj istraživanja odnosi se na utvrđivanje povezanosti personalnih vrednosti merenih Švarcovim upitnikom i tipova involviranosti potrošača u proizvod. Pretpostavka je da postoji povezanost određenih dimenzija vrednosti (Moć, Postignuće, Hedonizam, Stimulacija, Univerzalizam, Benevolentnost, Tradicija, Konformizam, Duhovnost, Nezavisnost i Sigurnost) i tipova involviranosti u proizvod: Zadovoljstvo, Važnost, Značenje, Posledice rizika i Verovatnoća rizika. Pored toga, ispitane su razlike u hijerarhijskoj strukturi vrednosti kod različitih grupa potrošača. Istraživanje je sprovedeno na uzorku od 200 potrošača sa teritorije Republike Srbije koji su činili ispitanici različitog pola, starosti, nivoa obrazovanja i kupovne moći. U istraživanju su korišćeni Švarcova Skala Univerzalnih Vrednosti (Schwartz, 1992) i Profil involviranosti (Laurent and Kapferer, 1985), kao i lista sociodemografskih varijabli. Najizraženija dimenzija involviranosti odnosi se na Zadovoljstvo, dok je sistemu vrednosti dominantan Hedonizam. Kada su u pitanju sociodemografske varijable, razlike u izraženosti vrednosnih dimenzija postoje u odnosu na godine starosti i visinu primanja. Nisu utvrđene razlike u vrednosnim orijentacijama ispitanika kada je u pitanju pol i nivo obrazovanja. Kao značajni prediktori za tipove involviranosti izdvojile su se sledeće vrednosne dimenzije: Benevolentnost, Samousmerenje, Stimulacija, Hedonizam, Moć, Tradicija, Konformizam, Duhovnost. Na osnovu vrednosnih dimenzija nije moguće predvideti tipove involviranosti koji se odnose na Značenje i Verovatnoću rizika.
Abstract
The main objective of the research was to determine the relationship of personal values measured Schwatrz‘s questionnaire and types of involvement of consumers in the product. The assumption is that there is a connection between certain dimension values (Power, Achievement, Hedonism, Stimulation, Self-direction, Universalism, Benevolence, Tradition, Conformity, and Security) and types of involvement in this product: Satisfaction, Importance, Meaning, Consequences of risk and Probability of risk. In addition, we examined the differences in the hierarchical structure of values in different groups of consumers. The study was conducted on a sample of 200 consumers from the territory of the Republic of Serbia, different genders, ages, education levels and purchasing power. The investigation used Schwartz’s scale of universal values (Schwartz, 1992) and profile involvement (Laurent and Kapferer, 1985), as well as a list of socio-demographic variables. The most dominanat dimension of involvement relates to pleasure, while the dominant value dimension is Hedonism. When it comes to socio-demographic variables, differences in the expression of value dimensions exist in relation to the age and income levels. There were no differences in value orientations of respondents when it comes to gender, and education level. As significant predictors for the types of involvement are allocated to the following value dimensions: Benevolence, Self-direction, Stimulation, Hedonism, Power, Tradition, Conformity, Spirituality. Based on the value dimension is not possible to predict the types of involvement that relate to meaning and probability of risk.
Reference
- Bauer, H.H. Sauer, N., Becker, C. (2006). Investigating the relationship between product involvement and consumer decision-making styles. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 342-354. doi: 10.5937/ markt1204245M
- Krugman, H.E. (1965). The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol 29, pp 349-356.
- Krugman, H.E. (1966) The Measurement of Advertising Involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol 30, pp 584-585.
- Kuzmanović, B. (1995a). Uvodna razmatranja za istraživanje promena vrednosnih orijentacija mladih u Srbiji. Psihološka istraživanja, Vol 7, pp 9-15.
- Kuzmanović, B., Popadić, D. i Havelka, N. (1995). Social changes and changes of values. Psihologija, Vol 28, pp 7–26.
- Lastovicka, J. (1979). Questioning the Concept of Involvement Defined Product Classes. U W.L. Wilkie (Ur.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol 6, pp 174-179.
- Laurent, G., Kapferer, J.N. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol 22, pp 41-53.
- Lindeman, M., Verkasalo, M. (2005). Measuring Values With the Short Schwartz‘s Value Survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol 85, pp 170-178. Doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_09
- Matanović, J., Majstorović, N., Obrić, M. (2011). Involviranost u proizvod i relacije sa samosvešću potrošača. Saopštenje na međunarodnom naučnostručnom skupu Savremeni trendovi u psihologiji, 14-16.10.2011. Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za psihologiju. Knjiga rezimea, pp 289-290.
- Pepper, M., Jackson, T., Uzzell, D. (2011) An Examination of Christianity and Socially Conscious and Frugal Consumer behaviors. Sage Publications Environment and Behavior, 43, 2, 274-290. Doi: 10.1177/0013916510361573
- Peter, P. and Olson, J. (1987), Consumer Behavior: Marketing Strategy Perspectives, Homewood, IL: Irwin.
- Petrović, I. (1997). Uključenost kao faktor odlučivanja potrošača. Psihološka istraživanja, Vol 95, pp 80.
- Petrović, I., Kovačević, P. (1996). Merenje involviranosti potrošača. Psihologija, Vol 26, pp 71-82.
- Petz, B. (1992). Psihološki rečnik. Zagreb: Prosvjeta.
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.
- Rot, N. (1978). Osnovi socijalne psihologije. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
- Rothschild, Michael (1984), Perspectives on Involvement: Current Problems and Future Directions, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol 11, pp 216-217.
- Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 30, pp 177-198.
- Schwartz, S.H., A. Bardi (2001). Value Hierarchies Across Cultures: Taking a Similarities Perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol 32, pp 268-290. Doi: 10.1177/0022022101032003002
- Slama, M.E., Tashchian, A., (1985). Selected socioeconomic and demographic characteristics associated with purchasing involvement. Journal of Marketing 49 (Winter), pp 72-82.
- Starčević, S. (2011). Lični koncept kao značajna determinanta izbora brendova i ponašanja potrošača u kupovini. Marketing, 42, 106-117. Doi: doi:10.5937/ markt1102106S
- Webb, B., Gountas, J. (2006). An Integrative Model of Brand Personality, Self-Concept and Consumer Personality Orientations. ANZMAC 2006 – Advancing Theory. Maintaining Relevance, Vol 4, pp 1-7.
- Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol 12, pp 341-352.
